ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS DI TINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA SMP PADA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROJECT BASED LEARNING BERBASIS ETNOMATEMATIKA

Authors

  • Rizka Alfami Majidi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi Author
  • Yanti Mulyanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi Author
  • Aritsya Iswatama Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi Author

Keywords:

creative thinking, cognitive style, ethnomathematics

Abstract

This study aims to determine the ability of mathematical creative thinking in terms of the cognitive style of junior high school students in the ethnomathematics-based project based learning model. The type of research used is qualitative research with test and interview instruments. The population used as a sample in this study is all students of class VII of SMP Negeri 5 Geger Bitung, Sukabumi Regency. The data analysis used is data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. Based on the data analysis, it was obtained that: Subjects with high mathematical abilities on average carry out creative thinking processes to be able to understand problems, practice concepts, solve problems, and connect one problem to another, in the reasoning process to be able to analyze assumptions, plan processes, solve problems, and draw conclusions. Furthermore, subjects with moderate mathematical abilities can only carry out creative thinking processes to understand problems and solve problems. These subjects can also only carry out the reasoning process to reach assumptions and do not determine generalizations correctly. Finally, for students who have low mathematical abilities, on average, their creative thinking ability only reaches as far as understanding the problem and cannot practice the concept, and students in reasoning only reach as far as determining initial guesses and they find it difficult to convey the results of their answers during interviews.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajeng, Dwijanto, & Wijayanti. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Pada Pembelajaran Read, Think, Talk, Write Ditinjau dari Kecemasan Matematika. PRISMA 2.

https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Andriadi, A., Fitraini, D., & Suhandri, S. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Berbasis Active Learning Untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. JURING (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 1(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v1i1.4768

Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Arifani, N.H., Sunardi, dan Setiawani, S. 2015. Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika Siswa SMP Kelas VIII di SMPN 6 Jember, SMP AlFurqon, SMPN 1 Rambipuji dan SMP PGRI 1 Rambipuji”. Jurnal Kadikma. Vol.6.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Hosnan 2014. Pendekatan Saintifik Dan Kontekstual Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21.

Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Johnson, Elaine B. 2007. Contextual Teaching dan Learning. Bandung. MLC. Kurniasih. 2014. Sukses Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kata Pena. Kosasih. 2014. Strategi Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Yarma Widya.

Marsinia, W., & Rahmi, D. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction (PBI) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis berdasarkan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. JURING (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 1(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v1i2.5424

Muhadjir, Noeng. (2014) Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Munandar, U. 2012. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Muthaharah, Y.A. , Kriswandani.,& Prihatnani, E.(2018).Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Mitra Pendidikan, 2(1), 63-75.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2017 “Metodologi penelitian Kualitatif”, Bandung; Rosda Karya.

Mortomore, Tilly (2008) Dyslexia and Learning Style, West Sussex: John Wiley&Sons.

Nasution, S. (1988), Metode PenelitianNaturalistik Kualitatif, Bandung: Tarsito. Ngalimun. 2013. Strategi Dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: AswajaPresindo Nurjannah, Z., & Irma, A. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembeljaran Creative

Problem Solving terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP Negeri 40 Pekanbaru. JURING (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 1(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v1i3.4776

Noel Entwistle, Style of Learning and Teaching An Integratedof Educational Psychology for Student, Teacher, and Lecturers, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981

Noer, S. H. (2009). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana? (pp. 521–526). Lampung: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 16 Mei 2009.

Riding, Richard and Rayner, Stephen, Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour, London: David Fulton Publishers, 1998

Sani, R. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.

Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sasmita, dkk. 2014. Problem Posing Pada Materi Bangun Datar. Pontianak: Untan Pontianak

Siswono, T.Y.E. (2011). Level Student’s Creative Thinking in Classroom. Academic

Journal, 6 (7): 548-553.

Supriadi, N. (2015). Pembelajaran Geometri Berbasis Geogebra Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis. 6(2), 99–109.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Surya, Dkk. (2018). Penerapan Model pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PJBL) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Kreatifitas Siswa Kelas III SD Negeri Sidorejo Lor 01 Salatiga. 06, (1), Hlm. 41 – 54

Sutikno. 2014. Metode dan Model-Model Pembelajaran. Lombok: Holistica. Syah, M. (2012). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Ulya, H., Masrukan, Kartono. (2012). Keefektifan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe PropingPrompting dengan Penilaian Produk. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education. 1(1) ISSN 2252-6927

Uno, H. B. (2012). Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Wibowo, Slamet. JPPP│Jurnal Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan 2017: Januari – Juni, Volume 2, Nomor 1, (125-139) http://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jppp DOI: 10.22236/JPPP_Vol2No1

Witkin, H.A., et al. 1977. “FieldDependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications”. Review of Educational Research, Volume 47 No. 1 pp. 1-64.

Woolfolk, Anita E. Educational Psychology, London: Allyn and Bacon, 1993

Downloads

Published

2025-11-02