MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MENGANALISIS KEBIJAKAN POLITIK DAN EKONOMI PADA MASA ERA REFORMASI  DENGAN PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING  PADA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XII IPS 3 SMA NEGERI 9 DENPASAR

Authors

  • GEDE ARISTA WIJAYA Program Studi Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG), Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21199888

Keywords:

Analytical Skills, Political Policy, Economics, the Reform Era, learning models, Problem-Based Learning, Students at Denpasar State Senior Secondary School No. 9.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the learning process involved in the analysis of political and economic policies during the Reform Era using the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model; to investigate students’ responses to learning about the analysis of political and economic policies during the Reform Era using the PBL model; and to improve students’ learning outcomes. This is a classroom action research study. The research subjects were 31 students in Class XII IPS 3 at State Senior Secondary School No. 9, Denpasar. The data collection techniques used included observation, learning outcome tests and documentation. In this study, the data analysis technique employed was quantitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that the learning process using the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model proceeded smoothly and in accordance with the plan. Furthermore, the use of the PBL model can enhance students’ ability to analyse political and economic policies. In addition, the research results indicate an improvement in students’ abilities from the pre-cycle to Cycle I and Cycle II; specifically, the average score in the pre-cycle was 64.51, in Cycle I it was 73.42, and in Cycle II it was 82.16, representing an increase of 8.74. In this regard, the use of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model in teaching the analysis of political and economic policies during the reform era has been able to foster a positive response from the students. This can be seen from the students’ average scores: in the pre-cycle, the average score was 64.51 with a classical mastery rate of 38.71 per cent; in Cycle I, the average score was 73.54 with a classical mastery rate of 41.93 per cent; and in Cycle II, the average score was 87.32 with a classical mastery rate of 100 per cent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antara, I.G.P. 1988. Teori Sastra. Singaraja : FKIP. Universitas Udayana. Arikunto,

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2014. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara Armoni,

Badrun, Ahmad. 1983. Ilmu Sastra. Surabaya : Usaha Nasional.

Budi Adnyana, Putu. 2004. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS SDN 5 Pedungan”. (Tesis tidak diterbitkan), Universitas Ganesha, Singaraja.

Elsi Megayani, Putu. 2013. ”Peningkatan Kemampuan Menganalisis Unsur Intrinsik Cerpen Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Siswa Kelas VII C Smp Sunari Loka Kuta Badung Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013”. (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan), Denpasar: Universitas Mahasaraswati

Kurniasih, & Sani, 2015. Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta :Kata Pena.

Lie, Anita. 2005. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta : Grasindo

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 1995. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.

Nurkancana,Wayan dan PPN Sunartana.1992. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Surabaya:Usaha Nasional

Nyoman. 2011. Teori Pengkajian Prosa Fiksi dan Drama. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.

Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Rosidi, Ajip. 1973. Sejarah Sastra Indonesia. Jakarta : Pustaka Jaya.

Sanjaya, H. Wina. 2013. Media Komunikasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Semi, Atar. 1984. Dasar-Dasar Anatomi Sastra. Singaraja : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Semi, Atar. M. 1993. Anatomi Sastra. Padang: Angkasa Raya. Sudjana. 1989. Metode Statistika.Bandung : Tarsito.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Sumardjo dan Saini KM. 1988. Apresiasi Kesusastraan. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.

Tarigan, Henry Wendi, dkk. 2006. Bahasa Indonesia. Klaten: Intan Pariwara.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-04