MODEL PENGAWASAN DAN EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN : STRATEGI PENGAWASAN DAN EVALUASI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KINERJA KELEMBAGAAN PESANTREN BERKEMBANG
Keywords:
Educational Supervision, Educational Evaluation, Institutional Performance, Developing Pesantren, Islamic Education ManagementAbstract
This study examines a model of educational supervision and evaluation as a strategic approach to enhancing institutional performance in developing pesantren. The urgency of this research lies in the need for developing pesantren to implement structured supervision and evaluation systems in order to ensure effective governance, educational quality, and institutional accountability amid social and educational policy changes. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach by analyzing literature on educational management, supervision, evaluation, and pesantren governance. The discussion focuses on concepts, principles, and models of supervision and evaluation relevant to the characteristics of developing pesantren, including internal supervision, performance evaluation, and institutional leadership roles. The findings indicate that systematic supervision and evaluation function as mechanisms for quality control, continuous improvement, and the strengthening of organizational culture within pesantren institutions. The implications of this study highlight that the implementation of adaptive and contextual supervision and evaluation models contributes to improved institutional performance of developing pesantren in managerial, academic, and Islamic educational value dimensions.
Downloads
References
Aida, N. (2024). Peran guru dalam meningkatkan prestasi belajar siswa: Strategi, metode, dan dampak terhadap pembelajaran. Al-Am: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1(1), 58–79.
Aimah, S. (2021). Manajemen mutu terpadu di pesantren. Lisan Al-Hal: Jurnal Pengembangan Pemikiran dan Kebudayaan, 15(2), 195–226.
Azra, A. (2012). Islamic education: Tradition and modernization. Kencana.
Azra, A. (2012). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan global. Kencana.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
Bush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership and management. Sage.
Bush, T., & Coleman, M. (2019). Leadership and strategic management in education. Sage.
Caldwell, B. J., & Harris, J. (2012). Why not the best schools? ACER Press.
Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (2013). The self-transforming school. Routledge.
Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5–23.
Devi, M. Y., Hidayanthi, R., & Fitria, Y. (2022). Model-model evaluasi pendidikan dan model sepuluh langkah dalam penilaian. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 675–683.
Dhofier, Z. (2002). Sekolah al-Qur’an dan pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Ulumul Qur’an, 3(4), 20–55.
Dhofier, Z. (2011). Tradisi pesantren. LP3ES.
Effendi, M. (2021). Pengembangan sumber daya manusia dalam meningkatkan citra lembaga di lembaga pendidikan Islam. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management, 2(1), 39–51.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation. Pearson.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). SuperVision and instructional leadership. Pearson.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2010). Collaborative leadership. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110.
Hanafi, H., Adu, L., & Muzakkir, H. (2018). Profesionalisme guru dalam pengelolaan kegiatan pembelajaran di sekolah. Deepublish.
Hasyim, S., & Zainuddin, M. (2024). Evaluasi pelaksanaan program membangun rumah rakyat (Membara). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasita’, 15(2), 130–143.
Herman, H., & Maru, J. (2024). Pengantar supervisi pendidikan.
Hess, R. S., Pearrow, M., Hazel, C. E., Sander, J. B., & Wille, A. M. (2017). Enhancing behavioral and mental health services within school-based contexts. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 33(3), 214–232.
Lestari, D. I., & Kurnia, H. (2023). Implementasi model pembelajaran inovatif di era digital. JPG: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 4(3), 205–222.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.
Maritim, E. (2024). Strategi mengatasi tantangan supervisi pendidikan. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 1(12).
Munawir, J. (2023). Pengembangan kompetensi profesional guru. Institut PTIQ Jakarta.
Murtyaningsih, R., & Utami, Y. (2024). Supervisi pendidikan sebagai strategi peningkatan mutu pembelajaran. Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah, 10(2), 536–545.
Preskill, H., & Boyle, S. (2008). Evaluation capacity building. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), 443–459.
Rahman, F. (1985). Islam and modernity: An intellectual transformation. University of Chicago Press.
Raihani. (2014). Creating a culture of quality in Islamic schools. Journal of Islamic Studies, 25(2), 1–20.
Rusdiana, A. (2023). Pengawasan dan evaluasi pendidikan semester II tahun akademik 2023/2024.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2009). The principalship. Pearson.
Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition. McGraw-Hill.
Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Dalam SAGE handbook of evaluation. Sage.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model. Dalam International handbook of educational evaluation.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.
Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision. Routledge.
