PENGARUH TEORI KONSTRUKTIVISTIK TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA KRISTEN DI SMA
Keywords:
constructivism, Christian Religious Education, learning outcomes, senior high school, active learningAbstract
This study explores how the application of constructivist theory influences student learning outcomes in Christian Religious Education (CRE) at the senior high school level. Constructivist theory emphasizes that students actively build their own knowledge through experiences, discussions, and reflection. In the context of CRE, this approach helps students not only understand theological teachings theoretically but also apply them in real-life situations. This research was conducted through a literature review by analyzing various sources such as journals, books, and previous studies. The findings show that constructivist learning approaches such as case studies, group discussions, and faith-based projects can enhance students’ comprehension, encourage critical thinking, and strengthen their spiritual attitudes and sense of responsibility. Furthermore, students become more engaged, confident in expressing their opinions, and capable of connecting lessons to their personal experiences. These findings highlight the importance of Christian education teachers being creative and reflective in designing learning experiences that are relevant and meaningful for students' faith development during adolescence.
Downloads
References
Ipapoto, J. F., Sibu, K., Nacikit, Y., & Pattiasina, A. (2025). Kreativitas Guru Pendidikan Agama Kristen dalam Menerapkan Media Pembelajaran. 1(4), 776–789.
Le Cornu, R., & Peters, J. (2005). Towards constructivist classrooms: The role of the reflective teacher. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6(1), 50–64.
Mensah, E. (2015). Exploring Constructivist Perspectives in the College Classroom. SAGE Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015596208
Mugo, A. M., Nyaga, M. N., Ndwiga, Z. N., & Atitwa, E. B. (2024). Evaluating learning outcomes of Christian religious education learners: A comparison of constructive simulation and conventional method. Heliyon, 10(11), e32632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32632
Nandi, A., & Das, T. (2023). CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORIES OF PIAGET AND VIGOTSKY : EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONAND COMPARATIVE STUDY. December.
Pendidikan, J., & Sihombing, R. (2025). Paradigma konstruktivisme dalam pendidikan agama kristen. May.
Pendidikan, P., Kristen, A., Agama, I., & Negeri, K. (2025). Pediaqu : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora. 4(1), 455–466.
Pokhrel, S. (2024). No TitleΕΛΕΝΗ. Αγαη, 15(1), 37–48.
Shanti, I & Manurung, A. D. R. (2020). Authentic Happiness As a Mediator of Learning Organization. 2(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.31933/DIJMS
Sidharta, J., & Jura, D. (2022). The Challenges of Constructivism Educational Philosophy for Christian Education. 1st Virtual Workshop on Writing Scientific Article for International Publication Indexed SCOPUS, 211–215. https://doi.org/10.2478/9788366675827-038
Spadafora, N., & Downes, T. (2016). Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, January. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6
Subkhi Mahmasani. (2020). View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk. September, 274–282.
Wilkerson, L. (2021). Constructivist Curriculum for Christian Transformation. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry, 19, 073989132098587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739891320985870
Yoder, P. J., Wiens, P. D., & Chou, A. (2021). Constructivist or Christian: A Mixed-Methods Examination of Teacher Purposes and Practices at Mennonite Schools. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 30(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2021.1906369
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yosina Aleta Yolanda Mnune, Merlin Filly, Merlin Filly, Radius W Huseng, Hirasius Atama, Indriani Sesfao (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.