FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN TUN OLEH PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARAStudi kasus: Putusan No.8/G/2022/PTUN.MDN
Keywords:
Administrative Court, Non-compliance, Eflorts, DecisionAbstract
The application of the principle of the rule of law in Indonesia has led to the emergence of state administrative courts. The establishment of the State Administrative Court is a legal eflort that can be taken by the public to protect their rights from the arbitrariness of state administrative officials. The purpose of establishing the State Administrative Court is to balance the position of Administrative Officials and the public as plaintifls. As a judicial institution, the content of the judge's ruling should be respected and must be obeyed by the litigating official. But in reality, so many officials do not comply and implement it. Even though the verdict has been pronounced by the judge and has legal force, seeing the attitude of officials who do not want to implement the decision seems to disrespect the judge's decision and can be interpreted as a form of resistance to non- compliance. Therefore, this research discusses extensively through a normative point of view regarding the lack of compliance of state administrative officials and what eflorts the plaintifl can make to ensure that the decision is implemented to the fullest.
References
A’An Efendi, 2016, Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, h. 45.
Abdullah Rozali, Hukum Kepegawaian, (Jakarta : Penerbit CV Rajawali, 1986) hlm 34 Baharudin Lopa, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1988, hlm. 67
Basah Sjachran, Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung, 1985, hlm 97
H. Rozali Abdullah, 1991, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, h. 23.
M. Nur Rasaid, Hukum Acara Perdata, cet. III, Sinar Grafika Oflset, Jakarta, 2003, hlm. 48 Moh. Taufik Makarao, Pokok-pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, cet. I, Rieneka Cipta, Jakarta,
2004, hlm.124
PP No. 43 Tahun 1991 dan Keputusan Menteri Keuangan RI No. 131129/KM.01/1991 tentang tata cara pembayaran ganti rugi Pelaksanaan Keputusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Roihan A. Rasyid, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2001, hal. 207
Sadhu Bagas Suratno, „Pembentukan Peraturan Kebijakan Berdasarkan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik‟, E-Journal Lentera Hukum, 4.3, 164
Sjachran Basah, Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia, op.cit.Hal.97
Sri Pudyatmoko, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Sebagai Salah Satu Fungsi Kontrol Pemerintah, Universitas Atma Jaya, Yogyakarta, 1996, hlm. 73
Sudikno Mertokusumo. 2006. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Edisi ketujuh. Yogyakarta: Liberty
Undang-undang Dasar 1945
UU No.5 tahun 1986 tentang perubahan UU No. 9 tahun 2004 tentang perubahan atas UU No. 5 tahun 1986 dan UU No. 51 tahun 2009 tentang perubahan kedua atas UU No. 5 tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
