HUBUNGAN MODEL, PENDEKATAN, DAN STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN TEORI BELAJAR KONSTRUKTIVISME DAN HUMANISME DI SD/MI

Authors

  • Imel Lisanti Universitas Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas Author

Keywords:

Learning Model, Learning Approach, Learning Strategy, Constructivism, Humanism, Elementary School (SD/MI)

Abstract

This article aims to examine the relationship between learning models, approaches, and strategies and the theories of constructivism and humanism in elementary schools (SD/MI). In basic education practice, the selection of appropriate learning models, approaches, and strategies greatly determines the success of the teaching and learning process. Constructivist theory emphasizes that students construct their own knowledge through experience and interaction with their environment, while humanistic theory views learners as whole individuals whose potentials, interests, and needs must be respected and optimally developed. Through a literature review approach, this article analyzes the conceptual relationship between learning models such as problem-based learning, cooperative learning, and contextual learning and the principles of constructivism. In addition, it explains how student-centered approaches and strategies align with humanistic values, including respect for individual differences, the development of intrinsic motivation, and meaningful learning. The findings indicate that learning models, approaches,and strategies systematically designed based on constructivist and humanistic theories can create active, participatory, and enjoyable learning experiences, while supporting students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor development in elementary schools (SD/MI). Therefore, the integration of these two learning theories serves as an essential foundation for designing effective learning that promotes the holistic development of learners.

References

Piaget, Jean. (1970). Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.

Vygotsky, Lev S.. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Maslow, Abraham H.. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

Rogers, Carl R.. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

Joyce, Bruce., & Weil, Marsha. (2009). Models of Teaching (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Sanjaya, Wina. (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Trianto. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suprijono, Agus. (2015). Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Romadhon Romadhon and Aslan Aslan, “CURRICULUM FLEXIBILITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: EFFORTS TO BUILD EDUCATION THAT IS RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE,” Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE) 5, no. 3 (2025): 622–33.

Wilda Rizkiyahnur Nasution and Aslan Aslan, “INTEGRASI MATA PELAJARAN CODING DAN KECERDASAN BUATAN (AI) DALAM KURIKULUM SEKOLAH DASAR SEBAGAI UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN ABAD KE-21,” JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY DEDICATION 4, no. 4 (2025): 4.

Aslan Aslan and Nashran Azizan, “OPTIMALISASI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA BELAJAR BERBASIS PEMBELAJARAN AKTIF DAN TEKNOLOGI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KOMPETENSI GENERASI SOCIETY 5.0,” JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY DEDICATION 4, no. 4 (2025): 4.

Mudzakir Mudzakir and Aslan Aslan, “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CURRICULUM AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN IMPROVING HUMAN RESOURCE QUALITY: A LITERATURE REVIEW,” Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE) 5, no. 3 (2025): 3.

Prisca Diantra Sampe and Aslan Aslan, “OPTIMISING STUDENT INTEREST AND TALENT DEVELOPMENT THROUGH INTRACURRICULAR LEARNING OPTIONS AND THEMATIC PROJECTS IN THE MERDEKA CURRICULUM,” Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE) 5, no. 3 (2025): 3.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-02